6 ms·
So in the described scenario, what advantage does an ssd-backed pagefile has over a ramdisk-backed one? Assuming the same sizes. Because the common recommendat
by alex77456 11mo ago
So in the described scenario, what advantage does an ssd-backed pagefile has over a ramdisk-backed one? Assuming the same sizes.
Because the common recommendation is "you need at least a few GB swap". We can change the total ram amount to 64 or 128.
- p_ing 11mo agoA RAMDisk-backed page file removes useful RAM from the system. It's a net-negative. You're using RAM that would otherwise go towards useful things, like programs or file cache. Again, if page file usage is a problem, you need more RAM, not less of it and certainly not allocating it to a RAMDisk.
- alex77456 11mo agoWhat you're saying should make sense. However: 32gb ram no pagefile: crashes 28gb + 2gb ramdisk pagefile: no crashes at all
- p_ing 11mo ago32GB RAM + page file on disk also no crashes. Not all applications will function without a page file, as I said. There's zero reason to use a RAMDisk for a page file. Stop listening to idiot gamers.
- alex77456 11mo agoI don't care about ssd lifetime. This is purely an experiment. But you are inadvertently illustrating my point pretty well
- p_ing 11mo agoI think you're under the false assumption that on Windows the page file is always being thrashed. That isn't how the VMM functions. SSD "short" life span even from a bunch of 4KiB reads/writes is vastly overstated. Anyone who discusses the page file in terms of SSD lifetime is again, uninformed.