9 ms·
> How does one show that no assistive technologies below some threshold were used? In this case, you don't: > immediately be banned without recourse In other
by jbstack 11mo ago
> How does one show that no assistive technologies below some threshold were used?
In this case, you don't:
> immediately be banned without recourse
In other words, if the maintainer(s) think it's LLM-generated, right or wrong, you're banned.
- koakuma-chan 11mo agoIdk why anyone would contribute to a project with an attitude like this
- hitarpetar 11mo agothat's fine, they probably don't want you then
- koakuma-chan 11mo agoI don't want them either. I'll find someone else who likes me the way I am. Plenty of fish in the pond.
- SoftTalker 11mo agoMake useful, carefully reviewed contributions and you'll be fine.
- IncreasePosts 11mo agoThat seems unlikely. Probably, what is going to happen, is if during a code review, you can't actually explain what your code is doing or why you wrote it, then you will be banned. I don't know much about this project, but looking at the diff with their previous policy, it's pretty clear that people were abusing it and not declaring that they use llms, and they don't actually know what they're doing
- jbstack 11mo agoThen a friendlier and clearer wording for the policy would work better. The current one says you will be "immediately" banned "without recourse" which implies that nothing like you are describing will happen.