4 ms·
What on earth are you saying? It's better to kill 20 children than to risk that 2 of them develop peanut allergies? I don't see how this can even begin to be an
by jbstack 11mo ago
What on earth are you saying? It's better to kill 20 children than to risk that 2 of them develop peanut allergies? I don't see how this can even begin to be an arguable position to take. And that's ignoring the fact that it isn't even a correct assertion in this case.
- repeekad 11mo agoThey’re not mutually exclusive options, we can save the 20 kids safely while having a mindset that values doing no harm. Telling anxious parents to have their kids avoid peanuts caused harm that wouldn’t have happened otherwise. I guess it’s valuable to better understand allergies, but learning at others’ expense isn’t worth it.