5 ms·
I find this hard to judge in the abstract, but I'm not quite convinced the situation for the modal company today is worse than their answer to "what if your col
by bschne 11mo ago
I find this hard to judge in the abstract, but I'm not quite convinced the situation for the modal company today is worse than their answer to "what if your colo rack catches fire" would have been twenty years ago.
- jacquesm 11mo ago> "what if your colo rack catches fire" I've actually had that. https://www.webmasterworld.com/webmaster/3663978.htm https://www.webmasterworld.com/webmaster/3663978.htm
- bschne 11mo agoI used to work at an SME that ran ~everything on its own colo'd hardware, and while it never got this bad, there were a couple instances of the CTO driving over to the dc because the oob access to some hung up server wasn't working anymore. Fun times...
- pluto_modadic 11mo agooh hey, I've bricked a server remotely and had to drive 45 minutes to the DC to get badged in and reboot things :)
- quesera 11mo agoReminiscing: this was a rite of passage for pre-cloud remote systems administrators. Proper hardware (Sun, Cisco) had a serial management interface (ideally "lights-out") which could be used to remedy many kinds of failures. Plus a terminal server with a dial-in modem on a POTS line (or adequate fakery), in case the drama took out IP routing. Then came Linux on x86, and it took waytoomanyyears for the hardware vendors to outgrow the platform's microsoft local-only deployment model. Aside from Dell and maybe Supermicro, I'm not sure if they ever worked it out. Then came the cloud. Ironically, all of our systems are up and happy today, but services that rely on partner integrations are down. The only good thing about this is that it's not me running around trying to get it fixed. :)