5 ms·
Images aren't like that for artistic effect, but for lower energy consumption. > We further apply default typefaces, dithered images, off-line reading options,
by chuho 11mo ago
Images aren't like that for artistic effect, but for lower energy consumption.
> We further apply default typefaces, dithered images, off-line reading options, and other tricks to lower energy use far below that of the average website.
https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/ https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/
- amelius 11mo agoOk, I didn't read that. But I still think it's _not_ a good idea to do that for a topic where personal safety is at stake. And besides, the quality is really too low anyway. I can barely recognize the thermocouples in those images.
- aposm 11mo agoHow can I take your comment seriously if you didn't read the article? It looks like someone didn't actually make an effort to understand the context of the images.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- creer 11mo agoAt the bottom of the page: Battery status 63%, not charging Power used 2.69W Uptime 5 weeks, 11 hours, 36 minutes Traffic from HN may be a problem today...