5 ms·
Larger image dimensions don't mean larger file sizes, see http://mir.aculo.us/2012/08/06/high-resolution-images-and-file-size/ http://mir.aculo.us/2012/08/06/hi
by madrobby 14y ago
Larger image dimensions don't mean larger file sizes, see http://mir.aculo.us/2012/08/06/high-resolution-images-and-file-size/ http://mir.aculo.us/2012/08/06/high-resolution-images-and-fi... for an explanation.
- mddw 14y agoYes, it does. Not linear larger files, but larger files at constant quality. His examples are conveniently chosen to sell his book. 20% bigger is 20% too much for a non essential asset.
- cheald 14y agoDouble image dimensions don't mean double file sizes, but they do mean larger file sizes. If you've figured out how to display the same non-vector images at full quality at arbitrary file dimensions with the same filesize, then you're going to be very, very rich.