4 ms·
Sending innocent people to prison would absolutely be a horrible form of violence against those people. That's why we have trials, with independent judges, jur
by marcuskane2 11mo ago
Sending innocent people to prison would absolutely be a horrible form of violence against those people.
That's why we have trials, with independent judges, juries and rules.
Remember when the Boston marathon bombing happened, and Reddit users identified dozens of different people as obviously, and definitely, the bombers (https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/reddit-regrets-role-in-online-witch-hunt-for-misidentified-suspect/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/reddit-regre...)? Remember when the LAPD opened fire on multiple random civilians who they thought might be Christopher Dorner (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Dorner_shootings_and_manhunt#Police_shooting_of_unrelated_civilians https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Dorner_shootings_a...) remember when the DC sniper was active and the tip line received thousands of calls from people claiming to have 100% certainty that they saw the sniper, then describe people of conflicting races, ages and physical descriptions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.C._sniper_attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.C._sniper_attacks)
We have trials so that we make sure we put the bad guys in prison, not random innocent people who were misidentified. They're for the benefit of everyone else, not for the criminal.
- mountainriver 11mo agoyeah we're not talking about that, we are talking about people who were caught in the act of murdering a bunch of people. Everything you gave is false equivalency, this view is widely supported. These people already took way too much from society, they don't need to take any more.