6 ms·
(For some reason I can't reply to the reply so will have to post here.) > But why couldn't you have both?! That's what I mean when I'm talking about a false di
by simanyay 14y ago
(For some reason I can't reply to the reply so will have to post here.)
> But why couldn't you have both?! That's what I mean when I'm talking about a false dichotomy, you're just using a strawman argument.
You can't have both because people don't have unlimited amount of time and resources. I'm not sure why I have to explain this.