8 ms·
I find it reassuring that you can still get access to the data running on your own device, despite all the tens of thousands of engineering hours being poured i
by no_time 1y ago
I find it reassuring that you can still get access to the data running on your own device, despite all the tens of thousands of engineering hours being poured into preventing just that.
- throawayonthe 1y agoI doubt you own hardware capable of any of the confidential computing technology mentioned
- kedihacker 1y agoWell microcontrollers can prevent you from repairing your own device with DRM and secure enclaves
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- no_time 1y agoMy 2017 bottom shelf lenovo has SGX whether I like it or not. In current year you can't really buy new hardware without secure enclaves[0], be it a phone, a laptop or server. Best you can do is refuse to run software that requires it, but even that will become tough when goverments roll out mandatory software that depends on it. [0]: unless you fancy buying nerd vanity hardware like a Talos POWER workstation with all the ups and downs that come with it.
- RedShift1 1y agoPretty sure you can turn off SGX in the BIOS?
- da768 1y agoIntel killed SGX on consumer CPUs a while ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31047888 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31047888
- heavyset_go 1y agoIntel TXT is another related trusted execution/attestation/secure enclave feature, not sure how prevalent that one is, though
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]