16 ms·
Thanks for writing the blog post; it was a fascinating read! I was curious about a couple of things: * Have you considered future extensions where you can sta
by hanwenn 1y ago
Thanks for writing the blog post; it was a fascinating read!
I was curious about a couple of things:
* Have you considered future extensions where you can start the VM before you completed the FS copy?
* You picked XFS over ZFS and BTRFS. Any reason why XFS in particular?
* You casually mention that you wrote 'otterlink', your own hypervisor. Isn't that by itself a complicated effort worthy of a blog post? Or is it just mixing and matching existing libraries from the Rust ecosystem?
- jeroenhd 1y agoNot the author, but: > Any reason why XFS in particular? XFS is still the default filesystem of choice for many enterprise systems. For instance, Red Hat states in their manual [1]: In general, use XFS unless you have a specific use case for ext4. There are good reasons to choose other file systems, but if you just want good performance on simple storage, XFS is a pretty good default. [1] https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/10/html/managing_file_systems/overview-of-available-file-systems#choosing-a-local-file-system https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- hanwenn 1y agoAlso: did you consider using LVM snapshots?