5 ms·
• I didn't say there's a line between "tech people" and "art people". Why would there be? • We're having this discussion because people are trying to equate an
by tummler 1y ago
• I didn't say there's a line between "tech people" and "art people". Why would there be?
• We're having this discussion because people are trying to equate an auto-amalgamation/auto-generation machine with the artistic process, and in doing so, redefining what "art" means.
• Yes, you can "be creative" with AI, but don't fool yourself-- you're not creating art. I don't call myself a chef because I heated up a microwave dinner.
- codedokode 1y ago> I don't call myself a chef because I heated up a microwave dinner. A better analogy would be "I don't call myself a chef when ordering from Uber Eats".
- _DeadFred_ 1y agoI'm not the artist just because I commissioned the painting and sent them a picture of my dog.
- frozenseven 1y ago• The other guy certainly did. And your subsequent reply was an endorsement of his style of gatekeeping, so. I mean, just talk to some of the the more active people in AI art. Many of them have been involved in art for decades. • If throwing paint at a canvas is art (sure, why not?) then so is typing a few words into a 'machine'. Of course many people spend a considerable amount more effort than that. No different than learning Ableton Live or Blender. • See previous points.