6 ms·
If you're going to do this, might as well go with AsciiDoc instead. It's vastly superior as a syntax. Markdown breaks down at the mere mention of something as t
by henrebotha 1y ago
If you're going to do this, might as well go with AsciiDoc instead. It's vastly superior as a syntax. Markdown breaks down at the mere mention of something as trivial as a nested list item containing a table of blockquotes.
- GavinMcG 1y agoNot that it couldn’t be trivial in the abstract, but I’m struggling to imagine a use for a nested list item containing a table of blockquotes. It doesn’t seem at all surprising that a tool wouldn’t anticipate that.
- shakna 1y agoThings from the design world, like Acceptance Criteria would happily require it.
- GavinMcG 1y agoIs a lightweight easy-to-read plain text markup language the right tool for that job?
- shakna 1y agoAbsolutely! The writers are generally not highly technically experienced, but have to produce highly technical documents that need to be regularly reviewed and changed for years at a time.
- eslaught 1y agoIf you're going to do this, why not generate Pandoc ASTs directly? You can do so from a number of languages and they support (by definition) a superset of any given markup's features, with blocks to call out directly for things you can only do in Latex. I assume the original question is asking about programmatic document generation, in which case working with a real AST is probably also a productivity and reliability win as well.