7 ms·
I can’t help but cringe whenever I see a Bluesky fan stubbornly clinging to the past by calling X ‘Twitter.’ This one went even further - using the old logo and
by wilt6269 1y ago
I can’t help but cringe whenever I see a Bluesky fan stubbornly clinging to the past by calling X ‘Twitter.’ This one went even further - using the old logo and even the outdated URL.
- dave1010uk 1y agoThat was an example of a social media company changing, with users not being able to migrate their data. Scroll a bit further and you'll see X.
- danabramov 1y agoMy post retraces a historical progression of social media, and it was indeed called "Twitter" at the time. You can scroll a bit down and you'll see "X" a bit below. In general, actually reading the articles you comment on won't hurt you.
- wilt6269 1y agoI did read the thread — and I’m specifically referring to the third (and final) diagram where it still literally labels X as “Twitter.” No amount of timeline layout gymnastics explains that. It feels less like faithful documentation and more like a pretext to take a swipe at the acquisition by “some guy,” which then segues into the whole “getting cooked by the algorithm” bit.
- airspresso 1y agoThat's clinging to straws. Many of us still prefer to call it Twitter since the new name makes no sense, especially when placed in a sentence.