6 ms·
So are people?
by voat 1y ago
So are people?
- softwaredoug 1y agoThe difference might be people are actually held accountable for the results.
- uncircle 1y agoAnd, in most cases, they tend to learn from their mistakes.
- MattGaiser 1y agoWhy is that better if in aggregate, the people who can be held accountable are worse anyway? We are killing thousands on the road to be sure we can blame a driver instead of a computer as one example.
- softwaredoug 1y agoIn the self driving case people are still held accountable. Now it’s the model developers and car manufacturers instead of drivers.
- tossandthrow 1y agoYes, we also clearly see and upwards pressure on people.
- amelius 1y agoPeople are way more reliable.
- gitaarik 1y agoThat's why we have code reviewing. If you review your AI generated code, understand it, and completely agree with it, that's fine of course. But the message of this article is that you still can't blindly rely on AI for even such simple tasks.