5 ms·
If you're at that point, the logical step would be to just support replying to the HTTP request with a "content-type: application/wasm" and skip the initial htm
by Aransentin 1y ago
If you're at that point, the logical step would be to just support replying to the HTTP request with a
"content-type: application/wasm" and skip the initial html step entirely.
- apatheticonion 1y agoI'm on this team 100%. It makes a lot of sense for a lot of use cases (where SEO doesn't matter).