6 ms·

Monopoly in charge of the world's video content shows users what is most profitable instead of what they want to see. "Content creators" suffer as a result. Bra

Monopoly in charge of the world's video content shows users what is most profitable instead of what they want to see. "Content creators" suffer as a result. Brain rot content is real, it's profitable, and it's only going to get "worse". Does anyone remember the internet before pop-up blockers? Like, right before. It felt like the same thing to me. The internet was infested with pop-ups and becoming borderline unusable, and then comes along the pop-up blocker (and other things, but I'm simplifying here) and there was a "golden age" which is now giving way to a new wave of advertising-based atrophy. Not sure what happens next.

namuol 1y ago
> Not sure what happens next. You said it: > it's only going to get "worse"
johnnyanmac 1y ago
The analysis in this article shows that revenue and likes didn't actually go down, though. Just views. That's only bad for sponsors overall. I do wonder how this applies for smaller channels, though. Larger creators may get better revshare to make up for whatever the heck is happening. The little guy always gets screwed.
bobsmooth 1y ago
>and there was a "golden age" That golden age was short lived because all our favorite websites were unprofitable and shutdown.
- themagician 1y ago
  > "That golden age was short lived because all our favorite websites were unprofitable and shutdown." Painfully true.
hhhAndrew 1y ago
One idea for what happens next, that rhymes with pop-up blocker revolution, is Gates' "disintermediation of everything" via AI, where agents on our behalf will be able to "find me a video I like and don't show me the ads", "renew my electricity contract and don't let them soft-scam me with their tricky pricing structure", "buy groceries online and don't get tricked into buying candy from a promo", etc. Agents make become like popup blockers in that way. Subsequent to that, I reckon we may see some sites adopting TOS forbidding people to have AI agents visit on their behalf.

namuol 1y ago

> Not sure what happens next. You said it: > it's only going to get "worse"

johnnyanmac 1y ago

The analysis in this article shows that revenue and likes didn't actually go down, though. Just views. That's only bad for sponsors overall. I do wonder how this applies for smaller channels, though. Larger creators may get better revshare to make up for whatever the heck is happening. The little guy always gets screwed.

bobsmooth 1y ago

>and there was a "golden age" That golden age was short lived because all our favorite websites were unprofitable and shutdown.

themagician 1y ago
> "That golden age was short lived because all our favorite websites were unprofitable and shutdown." Painfully true.

hhhAndrew 1y ago

One idea for what happens next, that rhymes with pop-up blocker revolution, is Gates' "disintermediation of everything" via AI, where agents on our behalf will be able to "find me a video I like and don't show me the ads", "renew my electricity contract and don't let them soft-scam me with their tricky pricing structure", "buy groceries online and don't get tricked into buying candy from a promo", etc. Agents make become like popup blockers in that way. Subsequent to that, I reckon we may see some sites adopting TOS forbidding people to have AI agents visit on their behalf.