6 ms·
He argued the case in 2016 iirc. The position against lidar was that it traps you in a local max, that humans use vision, that roads and signs are designed for
by homefree 1y ago
He argued the case in 2016 iirc.
The position against lidar was that it traps you in a local max, that humans use vision, that roads and signs are designed for vision so you're going to ultimately have to solve that problem and when you do lidar becomes a redundant waste. The investment in lidar wastes time from training vision and may make it harder to do so. That's still the case.
I love Waymo, but it's doomed to be localized to populated areas with high-res mapping - that's a great business, but it doesn't solve the general problem.
If Tesla keeps jumping on the vision lever and solves it they'll win it all. There's nothing in physics that makes that impossible so I think they'll pull it off. His model is all this sort of first principles thinking, it's why his companies pull off things like starship. I wouldn't bet against it.
- Applejinx 1y agoIf humans had radar they would reverse into obstacles less often, and not be blindsided or T-boned as readily so long as their radar could still reach the object moving rapidly in their direction. Elon is being foolish and weirdly anthropomorphic.
- homefree 1y agoIf humans had ten eyes always looking simultaneously and never got tired they would also not hit stuff.
- moralestapia 1y agoAnd yet ... Tesla is backtracking (read TFA) while Waymo is steadily getting there.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- anthem2025 1y agoIt’s amazing people heard that argument and didn’t immediately write him off as having zero clue what he’s talking about.