5 ms·
This is a familiar concept from reading about WW2 spy stuff (Between Silk and Cyanide, for example, which I highly recommend). But what REALLY intrigues me is t
by vertnerd 1y ago
This is a familiar concept from reading about WW2 spy stuff (Between Silk and Cyanide, for example, which I highly recommend). But what REALLY intrigues me is the typeface of the letter with its upper-case 'E' used in place of 'e'. What's up with that?
- jameshart 1y agoThat is peculiar. Brief internet search turned up a Reddit post where someone had a sample of typed text with the same odd typography: https://www.reddit.com/r/typewriters/s/f2CIY0TCm3 https://www.reddit.com/r/typewriters/s/f2CIY0TCm3 The suggestion that it may have been a striker from a bilingual - cyrillic typewriter that was mixed in is an interesting possibility; someone transcribing diplomatic telegrams in WWII may indeed have need of access to Cyrillic typewriters…
- anon_cow1111 1y agoMight be unrelated in this example, but when a message is written in a lazy ROT13-like cypher, the letter e becomes a notorious rat that allows anyone to break the entire thing in very little time. Randomizing/obfuscating the letter case might buy you a little time, though I think it's something else entirely here.
- justsomehnguy 1y agoZvtug oR haeRyngRq va guvf RknzcyR, ohg juRa n zRffntR vf jevggRa va n ynml EBG13-yvxR plcuRe, guR yRggRe R oRpbzRf n abgbevbhf eng gung nyybjf nalbaR gb oeRnx guR RagveR guvat va iRel yvggyR gvzR. Enaqbzvmvat/boshfpngvat guR yRggRe pnfR zvtug ohl lbh n yvggyR gvzR, gubhtu V guvax vg'f fbzRguvat RyfR RagveRyl uReR.
- notherhack 1y agoV guvax gur vqRn jnf gb fcyvg guR uvtu seRdhrapl "r" gb gjb qvssReRag flzobyf r naq R ng yRffRe serdhrapvRf. Fvzcyl ercynpvat nyy r'f jvgu R qbrfa'g qb gung.
- strtok 1y agoChatGPT was able to decrypt this in about 12 seconds with no context, which I found interesting.
- vonunov 1y agoYou can do it yourself in about the same time too https://www.dcode.fr/cipher-identifier https://www.dcode.fr/cipher-identifier
- Avshalom 1y agoLegibility would be my guess. Can't confuse ᴇ for c.
- pbhjpbhj 1y agoIf we're guessing I have ideas: 1) it's just the typeface, 2) the teletype machine has unique letter so the machine it was received in is known (and hence which staff received it), reducing the ability to forge messages. Different machines could have had special letters, or all machines handling secrets had that particular "e"?? 3) the machine broke and the repair shop only had a small-caps "E" handy.
- jameshart 1y agoI assume this is a typed up decrypt - not raw teletype output. Teletype would be all caps; this has been typed, capitalized, and laid out by a typist.
- andix 1y agoThe document on the picture was for sure typed on a typewriter. Teletype machines would either be all caps or all lower case. Also they wouldn't be able to print a multi column header like on top of the document.
- ants_everywhere 1y agoI had the same question about the upper case E. Some of the E's look a little curly like epsilons but I'm guessing that may be an optical illusion. But check out the 3 in "chancE3"