7 ms·
That's irrelevant. Cog-sci is largely folk psychology, and the problems in automating inference in AI demonstrate the model would eventually collapse. Question
by Mallowram 1y ago
That's irrelevant. Cog-sci is largely folk psychology, and the problems in automating inference in AI demonstrate the model would eventually collapse. Question is how do we toss this model aside for an irreducible form of post-symbolic relationship between brains and machines?
- suddenlybananas 1y agoI appreciate your gumption but I really think that you don't understand things as well as you think you do. Maybe read someone other than Paul Churchland.
- mallowdram 1y agoBoth Churchland's are out of date. Note the references above, this is a neurobiological, dynamic approach they're not party to. If you don't know what those are or optic flow, neural reuse are, then study them. Trad Neuroscience and cog-sci is no longer applicable.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoGod you are so smug about something you know essentially nothing about.
- mallowdram 1y agoI'm lead dev in a start-up that applies coordination dynamics to spatial-syntax. I probably know quite a bit more than you do about what I'm doing.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoI don't care what narrow thing you're working on, the brain is simply not as well understood as you think it is.
- mallowdram 1y agoWe have a substantial grasp of the allocortex to make significant probes into working memory that relate to semantic memory, episodic thought, emotion and certain senses. The very idea we understand that Sharp Wave Ripples encode this and that various scales of waves integrate to create memories and action is the beginning of bypassing existing computational frameworks.