4 ms·
I was mainly referring to the implication by omission that Blizzard had nefarious intent with its watermarking. Though, my comment was itself inflammatory; kar
by zdouglas 14y ago
I was mainly referring to the implication by omission that Blizzard had nefarious intent with its watermarking. Though, my comment was itself inflammatory; karma's a jerk.
- ghshephard 14y agoThe title, as currently, written, "Blizzard is secretly watermarking WOW screenshots" is pretty generic (and entirely accurate - They are watermarking WOW screenshots, and it is being done secretly). I'm curious as to what your title would have been: "Blizzard watermarking WOW screenshots?" - This is less informative, but removes the word "secretly?"
- furyofantares 14y agoWhat is the omission in the title, and what title would you suggest? The title does not, to me, imply any nefarious intent.