5 ms·
That's true, actual tools need all those criteria that you described. If you believe that functional languages don't meet those criteria, can you provide evide
by Scriptor 14y ago
That's true, actual tools need all those criteria that you described.
If you believe that functional languages don't meet those criteria, can you provide evidence for that? For example, from what I've gathered Clojure certainly has high quality libraries, an emphasis on speed when needed (performance is frequently superior to Python's), has debugging facilities, is easy to learn for someone with functional experience (just as Python or Java are relatively easy to learn for those with imperative experience) and can still be picked up with a little extra work otherwise, and has been used in production in large projects. I don't know about its hardware support so I won't comment on that.