6 ms·
how does this compare with frigate?
by snickerdoodle12 1y ago
how does this compare with frigate?
- roryclear 1y agofewer features, easier setup, with more GPUs supported. (I've not used frigate myself though, only watched videos)
- diggan 1y agoWhere can I find the list of supported GPUs? Frigate been able to handle everything I've tried so far, all from Nvidia and AMD GPUs to even Intel iGPUs.
- d0ugal 1y agoI have used Frigate for years, I think early on it didn't support all of those GPUs. So it might be that said videos are out of date.
- roryclear 1y agoMaybe my view of frigate and tensorflow (assuming frigate still uses it) is outdated then. I’m referring to tinygrad vs tensorflow when I say GPU support, of course google’s tensorflow is best for google’s TPUs. I’ve had better luck using tinygrad on my personal devices, but I am biased as it’s been a while since I’ve used tensorflow
- threecheese 1y agoThis would be a good point of differentiation to make on your GitHub page or for a technical audience on your website. Frigate is SOTA in many folks minds, and to show that you are using tinygrad over tensorflow may be a good “modern-ness” signal for that audience. Edit: another solution in this space shows a list of supported ML runtimes, which would be good info for folks wanting to run on specific hardware. https://github.com/boquila/boquilahub https://github.com/boquila/boquilahub
- roryclear 1y agoSupported runtimes list would be nice, but I don't have access to much hardware to test on. I aim to remove most dependencies and support anything that can run tinygrad + ffmpeg
- serf 1y agosame here -- it's also among one of the only things to support Coral devices and RPi video cores. I would imagine any GPGPU compute-capable pre-CUDA thing probably won't cut it.
- pimlottc 1y agoSorry, which one are you talking about, frigate or clear cam?
- diggan 1y agoUser of Frigate here. Seems these are some pretty major differences of what you can do for free with Frigate, but if you use Clearcam, you need to pay for "Clearcam Premium": - View your live camera feeds remotely. - Receive notifications on events (objects/people detected). - View event clips remotely. - End-to-end encryption on all data. What neither of the solutions seem to have, is encryption at rest. But I guess others, just like me, rather encrypt the volume/storage itself, instead of leaving it up to applications anyways, so might/might not matter for you.
- sugarpimpdorsey 1y agoit's AGPL so you have to give anyone that views your camera feeds a copy of the source
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- skinkestek 1y agoUnless you’re making changes, isn’t it enough to just link back to the original repo? That said, I’ve also been in the camp that avoids AGPL-except maybe as a way to sell a commercial license while still being "open source," or just to be obnoxious. And honestly, I am still failing to see the upside in being obnoxious for its own sake.
- roryclear 1y agoIt's AGPL because Ultralytics requires it to use YOLO: https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/pull/10717 https://github.com/blakeblackshear/frigate/pull/10717 I'd make it MIT tomorrow if you know a workaround or alternative model
- skinkestek 1y agoThanks! Both for the explanation and for being a person that respects the license even if you (like me) don't particularly like it.