6 ms·
It sounds like it's a B2B SaaS product that's gone through multiple pivots with very weak guidance on product on every step. Not that I'm disagreeing with you,
by awkward 1y ago
It sounds like it's a B2B SaaS product that's gone through multiple pivots with very weak guidance on product on every step.
Not that I'm disagreeing with you, but it's a very common way for things to go wrong.
- jmuguy 1y agoThere's just something about the specifics that seems really odd to me. "60% of features"... really? Sixty percent, specifically? Like I think this story is maybe based on some series of events at a SaaS and I agree with you in principle but it seems like the author ran it through a Linkedin thought leader LLM.
- mvdtnz 1y ago60% of the features in a product small enough to rewrite in 2 weeks is probably 3 features.