7 ms·
I think "just as pop-sci" is a bit generous. https://x.com/C_Kavanagh/status/1956336194352230570 https://x.com/C_Kavanagh/status/1956336194352230570 explains it
by depr 1y ago
I think "just as pop-sci" is a bit generous. https://x.com/C_Kavanagh/status/1956336194352230570 https://x.com/C_Kavanagh/status/1956336194352230570 explains it better than I can.
- FrustratedMonky 1y agoI think that list applies more to Eric. He is definitely in the 'conspiracy of nefarious forces are aligned against me' camp. Sabine, I think she was just referring to how institutions can become calcified around certain ideas. The old concept that 'new' ideas need to wait for the founders of old ideas to die off. (can't remember exact quote).
- tux3 1y agoMax Planck is the source of the famous quote. "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it"
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- NitpickLawyer 1y ago> Science progresses one funeral at a time
- analog31 1y ago>>> The old concept that 'new' ideas need to wait for the founders of old ideas to die off. (can't remember exact quote). I think Paul Feyerabend debunked that idea. Disclosure: Old physicist.