Without tests at first glance I might be having false asssumptions on modern JS optimisations: NaCl (C) http://juliamap.googlelabs.com.. http://juliamap.googlel

Without tests at first glance I might be having false asssumptions on modern JS optimisations: NaCl (C) http://juliamap.googlelabs.com.. http://juliamap.googlelabs.com... VS http://www.atopon.org/mandel/# http://www.atopon.org/mandel/# does not strikes me as JS being an order of magnitude slower than NaCl. It looks like I might be very wrong. I will make my opinion later by calculating decimal of PI or something like that in C and in JS to benchmark. I think I need to update my knowledge. :)