8 ms·
28 sample size. And sham reduced capacity by half as much as the real thing increased it? Anyone got any comment on tbe conclusion as I am sceptical but can be
by bravesoul2 1y ago
28 sample size. And sham reduced capacity by half as much as the real thing increased it? Anyone got any comment on tbe conclusion as I am sceptical but can be persuaded maybe.
- jdhwosnhw 1y agoUnfortunately I’m in the same boat. What appears especially telling is: > tVNS applied for 30 min daily over 7 consecutive days increased VO2peak by 1.04 mL/kg/min (*95% CI: .34–1.73*; P = .005), compared with no change after sham stimulation (−0.54 mL/kg/min; *95% CI: −1.52 to .45*) (emphasis mine) The 95% CIs for the case and control groups overlap. Seems borderline irresponsible to have a the abstract reporting a significant result.