7 ms·

While I do agree — using at least a non-monospaced font would be a choice that's nicer to the reader.

albanbrooke 1y ago
Haha, I agree! This is my blog and I can definitely improve the readability.
accrual 1y ago
Pros on cons I suppose. I liked the monospace font and I think it works well for some content, especially shorter form content. IMO a nice serif font is ideal for long form content though. I remember reading the serifs help guide ones eyes into the next character and create more unique shapes than sans or monospace.
- upofadown 1y ago
  There has been some recent research on this sort of thing. It ends up being whatever you are used to. Everyone used to think serif was better for reading but then everyone started reading a lot of sans on computer screens. So now people think sans is somehow inherently better. It's the same for mono vs proportional spacing. You are better at reading that which you have the most practice with. Most people are not used to reading monospaced prose even if they have seen a lot of monospaced code.
  - nailer 1y ago
    > Most people are not used to reading monospaced prose even if they have seen a lot of monospaced code. I've noticed that too - I read code all day, but there's something very odd about having conversations (prose) with Claude Code via a terminal window.
cosmicgadget 1y ago
Browser reading mode is an easy workaround.
- bee_rider 1y ago
  It is, but it is also a bit annoying that we have a “render sensibly” button now. Why isn’t that the default?
  - cosmicgadget 1y ago
    It is (a bit annoying).
- layer8 1y ago
  It depends, sometimes it doesn’t work on Safari, and Reader Mode still shows monospace. Might be <tt> vs. something else.
- Thrymr 1y ago
  But the whole point of the site is to demonstrate how great text-only websites are.
bee_rider 1y ago
Ideally websites wouldn’t specify a font at all, other than cases where that’s a necessary part of the design. The capability is nice to have—for example, if your website is a coding tutorial website, and you have interspersed code examples and prose, put the code examples in a fixed width font. But it is over-used. For example, why do sites pick serif vs non-serif? Leave it up to my browser.
- tombert 1y ago
  This is why I almost always send emails as plain text. I want people to be able to read their emails in any font they would like, not necessarily the font I used when I wrote the email. This isn’t just superficial, some people might use certain fonts that are easier to read for dyslexia, and I don’t think I should make their life artificially harder if it’s trivial for me to simply send a message as plain text.
  - franga2000 1y ago
    The problem with that is that we've already lost this fight and now "plain text email" means "the recipient will see it in 11pt Courier New". As for accessibility, the people who need that have already set up the required font overrides and other stuff so it doesn't really benefit them much to use plaintext. It's sad to think about how things could have been, but that's not the world we live in now...
    - tombert 1y ago
      I am ok with them reading it as 11pt Courier New. To me the whole point of sending messages as plain text is that it doesn’t really matter to me how they read it. If they want to be lazy and read it with the default that’s fine by me, at least I gave them an option. Also I like using text because it shows I’m not hiding any kind of tracking images or anything like that.
- mxmlnkn 1y ago
  On the other hand, fonts can be an expression of your personality. Shouldn't it be preferable to centrally enable overriding fonts instead of forcing every site designer not to use custom fonts to express themselves? Theoretically, it is easier to remove formatting than it is to add it. Therefore, this functionality should be part of the browser, not the website. Firefox has this as an option: "Allow pages to choose their own fonts, instead of your selections above". Personally, I quite like the site's design and its font. My gripe often is light gray text on a darker gray background. The bad readability that so many newer sites seem to prefer makes me question my eyes or my monitor capabilities. Reader mode in Firefox is also often very helpful.
tracker1 1y ago
I don't mind monospace too much, but definitely not the font chosen... the spacing is just awkward to say the least, my eyes just want to wander when trying to read... and I look at monospace fonts in a code editor all day. Fira Code or Inconsolata. That said, I'd probably just stick to "sans-serif" and let the browser/os preference hold. It's likely a helvetica/arial alike anyway and can be set by user preference if really wanted.

Haha, I agree! This is my blog and I can definitely improve the readability.

Pros on cons I suppose. I liked the monospace font and I think it works well for some content, especially shorter form content. IMO a nice serif font is ideal for long form content though. I remember reading the serifs help guide ones eyes into the next character and create more unique shapes than sans or monospace.

upofadown 1y ago
There has been some recent research on this sort of thing. It ends up being whatever you are used to. Everyone used to think serif was better for reading but then everyone started reading a lot of sans on computer screens. So now people think sans is somehow inherently better. It's the same for mono vs proportional spacing. You are better at reading that which you have the most practice with. Most people are not used to reading monospaced prose even if they have seen a lot of monospaced code.
- nailer 1y ago
  > Most people are not used to reading monospaced prose even if they have seen a lot of monospaced code. I've noticed that too - I read code all day, but there's something very odd about having conversations (prose) with Claude Code via a terminal window.

cosmicgadget 1y ago

Browser reading mode is an easy workaround.

bee_rider 1y ago
It is, but it is also a bit annoying that we have a “render sensibly” button now. Why isn’t that the default?
- cosmicgadget 1y ago
  It is (a bit annoying).
layer8 1y ago
It depends, sometimes it doesn’t work on Safari, and Reader Mode still shows monospace. Might be <tt> vs. something else.
Thrymr 1y ago
But the whole point of the site is to demonstrate how great text-only websites are.

bee_rider 1y ago

Ideally websites wouldn’t specify a font at all, other than cases where that’s a necessary part of the design. The capability is nice to have—for example, if your website is a coding tutorial website, and you have interspersed code examples and prose, put the code examples in a fixed width font. But it is over-used. For example, why do sites pick serif vs non-serif? Leave it up to my browser.

tombert 1y ago
This is why I almost always send emails as plain text. I want people to be able to read their emails in any font they would like, not necessarily the font I used when I wrote the email. This isn’t just superficial, some people might use certain fonts that are easier to read for dyslexia, and I don’t think I should make their life artificially harder if it’s trivial for me to simply send a message as plain text.
- franga2000 1y ago
  The problem with that is that we've already lost this fight and now "plain text email" means "the recipient will see it in 11pt Courier New". As for accessibility, the people who need that have already set up the required font overrides and other stuff so it doesn't really benefit them much to use plaintext. It's sad to think about how things could have been, but that's not the world we live in now...
  - tombert 1y ago
    I am ok with them reading it as 11pt Courier New. To me the whole point of sending messages as plain text is that it doesn’t really matter to me how they read it. If they want to be lazy and read it with the default that’s fine by me, at least I gave them an option. Also I like using text because it shows I’m not hiding any kind of tracking images or anything like that.
mxmlnkn 1y ago
On the other hand, fonts can be an expression of your personality. Shouldn't it be preferable to centrally enable overriding fonts instead of forcing every site designer not to use custom fonts to express themselves? Theoretically, it is easier to remove formatting than it is to add it. Therefore, this functionality should be part of the browser, not the website. Firefox has this as an option: "Allow pages to choose their own fonts, instead of your selections above". Personally, I quite like the site's design and its font. My gripe often is light gray text on a darker gray background. The bad readability that so many newer sites seem to prefer makes me question my eyes or my monitor capabilities. Reader mode in Firefox is also often very helpful.

tracker1 1y ago

I don't mind monospace too much, but definitely not the font chosen... the spacing is just awkward to say the least, my eyes just want to wander when trying to read... and I look at monospace fonts in a code editor all day. Fira Code or Inconsolata. That said, I'd probably just stick to "sans-serif" and let the browser/os preference hold. It's likely a helvetica/arial alike anyway and can be set by user preference if really wanted.