5 ms·
Maybe OP just used an ai editor to add their silly comments, so that would be fair game I guess? Or some humans just add silly comments. The article didn't sta
by robluxus 1y ago
Maybe OP just used an ai editor to add their silly comments, so that would be fair game I guess?
Or some humans just add silly comments.
The article didn't stand out to me as emberrassingly ai-written. Not an em dash in sight :)
Edit: just found this disclaimer in the article:
> I’ll show the generating R code, with a liberal sprinking of comments so it’s hopefully not too inscrutable.
Doesn't come out the gate and say who wrote the comments but ostensibly OP is a new grad / junior, the commenting style is on-brand.
- gjf 1y agoOp here, no AI generated code, I'm wondering what gives the impression that it is? I use Rmarkdown, so the code that's presented is also the same code that 'generates' the data/tables/graphs (source: https://github.com/gregfoletta/articles.foletta.org/blob/production/content/post/2025-07-14-clt/index.Rmarkdown https://github.com/gregfoletta/articles.foletta.org/blob/pro...).
- jpcompartir 1y agoIf you say there's no AI-generated code then I retract the original comment, nice work.
- jpcompartir 1y agoThat is not a disclaimer for generated code, it's referring to the code that generated the simulations/plots. I had read that line before I commented, it was partly what sparked me to comment as it was a clear place for a disclaimer.