4 ms·
Of course it's theft. The owner of that content didn't intend to give it to you for free, they expected to get paid for their work.
by probotect0r 1y ago
Of course it's theft. The owner of that content didn't intend to give it to you for free, they expected to get paid for their work.
- const_cast 1y agoI could copy A New Hope once for every atom in the universe, and no money is lost and the original continues to exist. Theft is moving stuff. You can't move software or digital assets, you can only copy them. If I committed a burglary and instead of taking your TV I go to Walmart and buy a copy, then that's not burglary. You certainly wouldn't report me to the police.
- tzs 1y agoThen how come a month ago you were talking about preventing zero-days from stealing files: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44578850 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44578850 ?
- const_cast 1y agoThis is the worst no you I've ever seen. I'm not concerned about my files being leaked because that's stealing. I'm concerned because they hold sensitive information that can be used for actual stealing, like for example with money. Malware isn't bad because it's stealing. That's stupid. I know you know it's stupid, so I don't know why you said it.
- tzs 1y agoThe point is that earlier you described a zero-day copying files as stealing the files, but now you say that copying data cannot be theft.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]