7 ms·
Neat, but it still fails my Forth simulator test, albeit a bit better than the last time. I hope they didn't have to raise the temperature of the ocean by too
by gooseus 1y ago
Neat, but it still fails my Forth simulator test, albeit a bit better than the last time. I hope they didn't have to raise the temperature of the ocean by too much to get these marginal improvements that definitely aren't even close to the kind of "general intelligence" you could get from training a clever child or monkey with 500 calories of sweets.
https://chatgpt.com/share/689525f4-20f0-8003-8bf6-f1f21dde6b11 https://chatgpt.com/share/689525f4-20f0-8003-8bf6-f1f21dde6b...
You know what would be more impressive? If it said "Hey, I'm actually not designed to simulate a Forth machine accurately, I'm only going to be able to approximate it (poorly)). If you want an accurate Forth machine you should just implement this code: [Simple Forth Implementation]".
Or better yet, it could recognize when it was being asked to "be" a machine, and instead spin up a side process with the machine implementation and redirect any prompts to that process until a "STOP" token is reached.