9 ms·
They didn't claim that there were any, just that AGI isn’t a necessary requirement for an application to be world-changing.
by achileas 1y ago
They didn't claim that there were any, just that AGI isn’t a necessary requirement for an application to be world-changing.
- socalgal2 1y agoThey did claim it was possible there were > There are possibly applications of existing AI/ML/SL technology which could be more impactful than general intelligence It's not unreasonable to ask for an example.
- wavemode 1y agoThey said "there are possibly applications", not "there are possible applications". The former implies that there may not be any such applications - the commenter is merely positing that there might be.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- gilfoy 1y agoSo they possibly said something to try and sound smart, but hedged with “possibly” so that nobody could ask for details or challenge them. Possibly peak HNery