6 ms·
Gptel has been working great for me. I'd be interested in checking this out but I only have so much time to set up and test new tools. What features would make
by riskassessment 1y ago
Gptel has been working great for me. I'd be interested in checking this out but I only have so much time to set up and test new tools. What features would make it worthwhile to switch from gptel?
- iLemming 1y agoYou don't "switch" from gptel as this package solves a problem of a different dimension. Gptel is still great for tons of other things, even though it's not suitable for "project context-wise" LLM workflows.
- azkae 1y agoI am using macher for small edits on a codebase with gptel: https://github.com/kmontag/macher https://github.com/kmontag/macher The package define a list of tools that gptel can use to inspect and edit a project. The tools are packaged as a preset so all you have to do is add "@macher" to your prompt to include the tools & update the system directive.