9 ms·
Am I the only one tired over how TorrentFreak will say anything, related or not, to try to confirm their bias? This aid was decided on for over 5 months ago, in
by Peer 14y ago
Am I the only one tired over how TorrentFreak will say anything, related or not, to try to confirm their bias? This aid was decided on for over 5 months ago, in march 2012 (http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/574/a/94013 http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/574/a/94013), and it is obviously not the result of Sweden trying to get at Svartholm. But if you want to be believe it then please do...
- cpach 14y agoThanks for the reference! See page 8, section 3: »The funds available for the period covered by the strategy amount to approximately SEK 400 million«. Can we end the speculation now, please?
- mongol 14y agoYes, but before that maybe we should throw the ball back in Torrentfreak's court. They tried to mislead us?
- cpach 14y agoWell, their bias is quite obvious, isn't it? IMO their articles get far too many upvotes around here. I actually flagged this article. Didn't seem to help much though.
- cpach 14y agoOh, and by the way: If Torrentfreak would like to be considered a venue of serious journalism, they ought to learn how to find sources like the one Peer linked to. It's not even written in Swedish, for the love of ${DEITY}, so I do think it can be considered low-hanging fruit.
- wccrawford 14y agoI'm not saying they did, but it's possible that they threatened to withhold this aid if they didn't get him. We currently don't know, and saying either way at this point doesn't mean much. We need some actual proof.
- itcmcgrath 14y agoI'm not saying they did, but it is possible thay they threatened to bomb them with buckets of blue paint if they didn't get him. We currently don't know, and saying either way at this point doesn't mean much. We need some actual proof. Or, in other words, you can pretty much make up anything and flag it as a possible reason. A common ploy in propaganda which causes the same affect, if you if add a disclaimer that 'we just don't know'
- itcmcgrath 14y agos/affect/effect/ Proof-reading fail.
- adgar 14y agoYou're right. We're just asking questions. There's nothing wrong about asking questions when there's no proof one way or the other. That's why I think Barack Obama is from Kenya and Karl Rove personally blew up the twin towers.
- DigitalSea 14y agoSvartholm has been in Cambodia for more than 5 months, hasn't he? Not to mention it's a known fact he's been there many times before. So wouldn't it make sense that the Swedish government made this look like it wasn't related by pre-planning in advance the all of a sudden generous and higher than usual aide payment in exchange for Svartholm being deported?
- guelo 14y agoI didn't know Sweeden gave money to Cambodia and I am glad that TorrentFreak informed me of this. Foreign aid from rich to poor countries is used in general to keep diplomatic cooperation flowing smoothly in matters of interest to the giver country.
- nixy 14y agoIt's "Sweden," not "Sweeden." I see a lot of people making that mistake on HN[1]. [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=site:news.ycombinator.com+sweeden http://www.google.com/search?q=site:news.ycombinator.com+swe...
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- jesseendahl 14y agoLooks like HN strips out the quotes needed to make this query work. Here: http://goo.gl/zMUQY http://goo.gl/zMUQY
- Zirro 14y agoSweden is one of few countries that reach the United Nations goal stating that countries should give one percent of their GNP as foreign aid. According to the reports I could find it is currently the largest giver of foreign aid in the world, with regards to it's economy and population. This wasn't spontaneous. It happens every year although the amounts changes as we see here.
- naturalethic 14y agoPoor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
- nl 14y agoSweden's foreign aid program is one of the best in the world[1], and doesn't fund rich people as you are implying here. If you have proof otherwise I'd like to see it. Otherwise - it's is way to easy to smear something in an off-hand way like that. [1] http://www.thelocal.se/16158/20081205/ http://www.thelocal.se/16158/20081205/
- reinhardt 14y agoNobody is claiming that Svartholm alone was worth $60M to Sweden. Still, is it equally "obvious" to you that not even a tiny fraction of the lump amount was allocated to "strengthen the relationships between the immigration departments" of the two countries? If you want to believe it then please do...
- Peer 14y agoI thought that was exactly what the article tried to imply. From the article: "But today, in another one of those unusual political coincidences, Cambodian officials announced the “strengthening of bilateral ties” with Sweden – along with a $59 million aid package sweetener."
- reinhardt 14y agoThe implication is that the package helped (in part or in whole, that's not implied) sweeten the deal. How does the fact that it was decided half a year go make it obvious that the implication is wrong? Wasn't Svartholm wanted back then?
- kmfrk 14y agoOh yeah. It's basically only good for learning about when a tracker gets shut down.
- sandstrom 14y agoHere is a historical breakdown of previous Swedish aid to Cambodia (data from 1975 and onwards): http://www.openaid.se/en/countries/kambodja?year=2011 http://www.openaid.se/en/countries/kambodja?year=2011