If you read the judgement it basically says that because the FBI eventually returned the money, she no longer has a live interest as an individual. They also d

If you read the judgement it basically says that because the FBI eventually returned the money, she no longer has a live interest as an individual. They also denied that she’s part of some well defined class for a class action. It’s not like they are saying there’s some other court she can go to. US courts are generally infamous for denying justice whenever they see fit using technicalities like “standing” and other procedural grounds. Environmental law violations, illegal surveillance programs, civil asset forfeiture like here, and constitutional violations are quite often practically impossible to get courts to address, especially if parts of the US government are the defendant.