6 ms·
> gatekeeping and censorship that's a weird thing to say about simply banning payments to people who profit from rape and incest content. > AREN'T EVEN TOLD w
by ffjffsfr 1y ago
> gatekeeping and censorship
that's a weird thing to say about simply banning payments to people who profit from rape and incest content.
> AREN'T EVEN TOLD what is going on
it is very clear what is going on, they are making content profiting from rape and incest and they are getting punished for it.
- duxup 1y agoI don't think you read my post entirely / clearly.
- ffjffsfr 1y agoI don't think you read the post you are commenting about. Article says explicitly what is the problem with problematic content. It explicitly mentions rape and incest content.
- duxup 1y agoYou quoted my words, if you aren’t interested what I was saying/ my example … don’t reply to me or quote me then?
- const_cast 1y agoIs this content legal, or do you just personally find it objectionable? Because, no offense, nobody cares what you find objectionable. You could've replaced "rape and incest content" in your comment with "silly content" and it would've had the same impact. Not that I don't think rape or incest are objectionable, of course I do. I just don't think I or you get to make that determination. I'm self-absorbed, but not that self-absorbed. That's a collective decision that should be made.
- pixxel 1y ago[dead]