5 ms·
Looks like nothing a little duct tape couldn't handle.
by hotboxin 1y ago
Looks like nothing a little duct tape couldn't handle.
- nielsbot 1y agoWhy should I have to waste my time and duct tape on their shitty scam? :) Easier to just never stay at a Hyatt.
- burnt-resistor 1y agoDuct tape adhesives (including polyterpene resin) might register as VOCs. Now, if you duct taped a piece of absolutely clean aluminum foil to it, then that could be fine.
- gblargg 1y agoI'd take the opposite approach, put something in the room that continually triggers it so they keep coming up and then just ignore it eventually.
- octo888 1y ago"Fire Safety Device Interference Fee: $1,000"
- bell-cot 1y agoIANAL - but might doing that sift the burden of proof, and force Hyatt to show that the Rest device met regulatory standards as a fire detector?
- ungreased0675 1y agoI bet there are standards about this, and I’d also bet Rest has optimized their product for stealing money, not safety.
- anthonyeden 1y agoI have seen tradies attempt to ‘disable’ smoke particle detectors by putting tape or a rubber glove over the sensor. This technique often triggers the alarm almost immediately. Commercial fire sensors do have plastic caps which block airflow without triggering an alarm. They’re designed to be kept on during construction until each sensor is commissioned.