7 ms·
fork, task claude to remove all github dependence, build.
by janoelze 1y ago
fork, task claude to remove all github dependence, build.
- gpm 1y agoI did this locally to try it out :) Also stubbed out the telemetry and added jj support. "Personalizing" software like this is definitely one of LLMs superpowers. I'm not particularly inclined to publish it because I don't want to associate myself with a project harvesting emails like this.
- janoelze 1y agoyes, i was just doing/thinking the same, it was an interesting experience to sculpt a somewhat complex codebase to my needs in minutes.
- BeetleB 1y ago> and added jj support Please do the same for Aider :-) https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/issues/4250 https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/issues/4250
- gpm 1y agoBe the change you want to see! This is pretty close to a best case task for these models because it's a relatively direct "translation" of existing code. There's a big difference between "something actually ready for use" and "claude hacked sometime together with bubblegum and ducttape that works on my system" though - doing it properly will probably take a bit of work.
- hsbauauvhabzb 1y agoUse a telemetry backed tool to remove telemetry from another telemetry backed tool?
- janoelze 1y agoit came to mind first, you're free to use whatever flavour of LLM f̶l̶o̶a̶t̶s̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶b̶o̶a̶t̶ vibes your code.
- hsbauauvhabzb 1y agoThat doesn’t change the naïvety of the response.
- collingreen 1y agoYour insult calling the commenter naive requires all telemetry from all sources to be the same. I disagree with who is naive in this exchange.
- TeMPOraL 1y agoThere's telemetry you consent to, and telemetry you don't. Just because I'm fine with a tool like Claude Code collecting some telemetry, doesn't mean I'm fine with a different party collecting telemetry - and the two products being used together doesn't change it. It's not naive, it's simply my right.