5 ms·
Actually, while MCP is a great direction for standardizing context, the "special sauce" of Ego isn't the context-passing itself, but the proprietary engine that
by jrhatigan 1y ago
Actually, while MCP is a great direction for standardizing context, the "special sauce" of Ego isn't the context-passing itself, but the proprietary engine that uses that context to dynamically generate prompts from a deep personality model.
For the MVP, I had to build the custom state handler to prove out that core persona logic first. Long-term, I'd love for Ego to accept context from standard protocols like MCP—it would make the engine even more versatile.
Appreciate the sharp question!
- maxbaines 1y agoSystem Prompt aside and not that critical today, however you look at it you are stuffing context. MCP is good at that and it works in most AI‘s.
- jrhatigan 1y agoYou're definitely right for now, MCP is great for 'stuffing context'. However, the long-term goal of this framework is to make the persona itself dynamic. It's designed to use that context to subtly update a persona's core personality traits over time, creating a more 'life-like' evolving 'virtual soul'. The cherry-on-top is framing it all as a 'Persona-as-a-Service' API to make the dev workflow straightforward but powerful. It's not for every application, but for anything that needs real character depth - like in gaming or advanced assistants - the goal is to make it simple for any developer to create those deeper, more meaningful interactions that are typically hard to get right.