115 ms·
“They would keep their pay and benefits but wouldn't be entitled to bonuses” This seems like a win for both sides. Employee’s would still be paid for keeping t
by codeddesign 1y ago
“They would keep their pay and benefits but wouldn't be entitled to bonuses”
This seems like a win for both sides. Employee’s would still be paid for keeping the non-compete.
- black6 1y agoThat's always been the actual effect of non competes in the US. Slavery was abolished; you can't be told by a former employer that you can't work for someone else unless they continue to pay you not to. That you're being downvoted is telling for the HN crowd who will rally behind "tax the rich" but ignore the call to "help the poor."