6 ms·
1. The attack is to brute force the shared secret (password). This can be done offline because by capturing the exchange you have the ANonce and SNonce and all
by jdthomas 14y ago
1. The attack is to brute force the shared secret (password). This can be done offline because by capturing the exchange you have the ANonce and SNonce and all other information required to generate the same key -- except the shared secret. Try lots of passwords and check if you generate the same PTK as the two stations do.
2. Encrypted with what? This is the key exchange stage that is attacked here.
802.11w adds signing to management frames which eliminates the deauth attack -- makes it harder to capture the EAPOL frames. Also, IIRC, WPA2-enterprise would not be susceptible to this sort of attack; you've pre-shared a key rather than a (short) password for generating one.
edit: spelling
- delackner 14y agoHonest question: since all devices connecting to a WIFI network are by definition within a short distance of the router itself, is there a WIFI solution that uses pre-shared key cryptography? That seems to me to be the only truly unbreakable option.
- caspianm 14y agoPassword authenticated key exchange should do what we want. I was hoping WPA2 would have have used it already. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Password-authenticated_key_agreement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Password-authenticated_key_agre...