8 ms·

> In plain language: > No matter how sophisticated, the system MUST fail on some inputs. Well, no person is immune to propaganda and stupididty, so I don't se

by haneul 1y ago

> In plain language: > No matter how sophisticated, the system MUST fail on some inputs. Well, no person is immune to propaganda and stupididty, so I don't see it as a huge issue.

amelius 1y ago
But what then is the relevance of the study?
- haneul 1y ago
  I suppose it disproves embodied, fully meat-space god if sound?
  - amelius 1y ago
    I'm looking at the title again and it seems wrong, because AGI ~ human intelligence. Unless human intelligence has non physical components to it.
vidarh 1y ago
I have no idea how you believe this relates to the comment you replied to.
- harimau777 1y ago
  If I'm understanding correctly, they are arguing that the paper only requires that an intelligent system will fail for some inputs and suggest that things like propaganda are inputs for which the human intelligent system fails. Therefore, they are suggesting that the human intelligent system does not necessarily refute the paper's argument.
  - vidarh 1y ago
    If so, then the papers argument isn't actually trying to prove that AGI is impossible, despite the title, and the entire discussion is pointless.