5 ms·
Interesting. What LLM model? 4o, o3, 3.5? I had horrible performance with earlier models, but o3 has helped me with health stuff (hearing issues).
by maliker 1y ago
Interesting. What LLM model? 4o, o3, 3.5? I had horrible performance with earlier models, but o3 has helped me with health stuff (hearing issues).
- unsupp0rted 1y agoWhichever the default free model is right now- I stopped paying for it when Gemini 2.5 came out in Google's AI lab. 4o, o4? I'm certain it wasn't 3.5 Edit: while logged in
- pants2 1y agoIf you're logged in, 4o, if you're not logged int, 4o-mini. Both don't score well on the benchmark!
- askafriend 1y agoThis gets at the UX issue with AI right now. How's a normie supposed to know and understand this nuance?
- unsupp0rted 1y agoOr a non-normie. Even while logged in, I had no idea what ChatGPT model it was using, since it doesn't label it. All the label says is "great for everyday tasks". And as a non-normie, I obviously didn't take its analysis seriously, and compared it to Grok and Gemini 2.5. The latter was the best.
- unsupp0rted 1y agoAdded context: While logged in
- maliker 1y agoMight be worth trying again with Gemini 2.5. The reasoning models like that one are much better at health questions.
- unsupp0rted 1y agoGemini 2.5 in AI Studio gave by far the best analysis
- icelancer 1y ago> Whichever the default free model is right now Sigh. This is a point in favor of not allowing free access to ChatGPT at all given that people are getting mad at GPT-4o-mini which is complete garbage for anything remotely complex... and garbage for most other things, too. Just give 5 free queries of 4o/o3 or whatever and call it good.
- dgfitz 1y agoI can’t believe you’re getting downvoted for answering the question about the next-token-predictor model you can’t recall using. What is happening?