5 ms·
Now apply this reasoning to Trump standing in Air Force One and saying that he would bring someone back of the Supreme Court said to. It's on video.
by flyingcircus3 1y ago
Now apply this reasoning to Trump standing in Air Force One and saying that he would bring someone back of the Supreme Court said to. It's on video.
- 93po 1y agoI spent 10+ minutes trying to find anything Trump has said on camera about the copyright office, and went through the only video I could find of Trump on air force one in the past week to see any references to this, and saw none.
- flyingcircus3 1y agohttps://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/trump-if-supreme-court-said-bring-somebody-back-i-would/2025/04/14/a14e2784-7e20-4bed-bc44-1f9a3ee57599_video.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/trump-if-supre... It's not related to copyright. It is an example of your hypothetical standard required to attribute something to Trump. My point is that even when he is on camera saying something, that does not prevent the post facto rationalizations. Even if he was on tape firing this person, people would rationalize this away too.