26 ms·
That table is unfortunately quite old. I can't personally say what have changed, but it is hard to put much confidence in the relevance of the information.
by ObscureScience 1y ago
That table is unfortunately quite old. I can't personally say what have changed, but it is hard to put much confidence in the relevance of the information.
- lifthrasiir 1y agoYeah, also it doesn't compare actual implementations, just plain checkboxes. I'm aware of two specific substantial performance regressions for musl: exact floating point printing (it uses Dragon4 but implemented it way slower than it could have been) and memory allocator (for a long time it didn't any sort of arena like pretty much every modern allocator---now it does with mallocng though).