"You're just worshipping the billionaires" is not a good rebuttal to the author's arguments. You haven't addressed "Try getting a job without LinkedIn. Try buy

"You're just worshipping the billionaires" is not a good rebuttal to the author's arguments. You haven't addressed "Try getting a job without LinkedIn. Try buying a phone that doesn't run android or iOS." Your argument here would apply to everything then, why restrict it to "techno"? Try driving a car without buying gas from a small number of oil companies. Try using electricity without going through utility monopolies. Try using a credit card without going through... yada yada. Does that mean we currently live in oil-gas-electro-feudalism? If you really think that, then your fundamental argument is: 'the social order is the same as it's always been', which just seems unnecessarily reductionist. The term techno-feudalism is clearly politically loaded rather than empirically descriptive, and I think your response makes that pretty clear.