6 ms·
>both authors of both apps state so. I am Privacy Badger's author. https://privacybadger.org/#Is-Privacy-Badger-compatible-with-other-extensions%2c-including-
by ghostwords 1y ago
>both authors of both apps state so.
I am Privacy Badger's author.
https://privacybadger.org/#Is-Privacy-Badger-compatible-with-other-extensions%2c-including-other-adblockers https://privacybadger.org/#Is-Privacy-Badger-compatible-with...
https://privacybadger.org/#How-is-Privacy-Badger-different-from-Disconnect%2c-Adblock-Plus%2c-Ghostery%2c-and-other-blocking-extensions https://privacybadger.org/#How-is-Privacy-Badger-different-f...
- JCattheATM 1y agoWow, I apologize, and very interesting! This is some sort of tech version of mansplaining, I guess, lesson learned! I was certain on the PB github or something there was something saying not to use it with uBlock, and likewise on gorhills github, but maybe it was a mandella effect or something. In any case, thanks for the clarification and humbling.
- ghostwords 1y agoHey, that's such a nice response, I appreciate it. I think the thing on uBO's side is here on https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock : >Do NOT use uBO with any other content blocker. uBO performs as well as or better than most popular blockers. Other blockers can prevent uBO's privacy or anti-blocker-defusing features from working correctly. My perspective: - uBO is good enough by itself - PB is good enough by itself - uBO comes with unique features - PB comes with unique features - While using uBO with PB may indeed cause some problems like anti-blocker-defusing features to break, it doesn't seem like a big deal for most people - uBO alone is good, PB alone is good, uBO + PB is also good
- JCattheATM 1y agoNo worries, and thanks for creating PB and the clarification.