6 ms·
I wonder if a managed K8S approach wouldn’t be better? Most Enterprises I know will anyway need to deploy legacy software, so the need for something like K8S ne
by acivitillo 1y ago
I wonder if a managed K8S approach wouldn’t be better? Most Enterprises I know will anyway need to deploy legacy software, so the need for something like K8S never really goes away. The question is if EU Enterprises really need stuff like AWS Sagemaker rather than just spinning up Jupyter Hub on K8S…
- sam_lowry_ 1y agoIt was a wonder to observe Kubernetes take over the server room infrastructure by storm while morphing from being exactly the wrong tool to manage legacy software to the default option for lift-and-shift cloud migrations. I still wonder how much K8S is a the right platform to deploy database software or weblogic clusters. But people do it on a massive scale.
- raffael_de 1y ago> if EU Enterprises really need stuff like AWS Sagemaker The author already makes it clear that replicating for example AWS is not desirable. AWS Sagemaker is basically an app running on EC2 (for Notebooks, training, inference) and S3 for the data. And that's what needs to be set up first: EC2 and S3 (and incidentally also IAM, VPC and SQS). Unsurprisingly those have been also the first services that AWS released.
- sebazzz 1y ago> legacy software, so the need for something like K8S never really goes away TIL software running in Docker containers is legacy. What cloud kool-aid are you drinking?