8 ms·
SNCF was one of the early bidders for this project, proposing the I5 route. They later pulled out from the politics of the Central Valley line in 2011, and went
by frinxor 1y ago
SNCF was one of the early bidders for this project, proposing the I5 route. They later pulled out from the politics of the Central Valley line in 2011, and went on to successfully implement high speed rail in Morocco instead - which went live in 2018.
Here we are 8 years after they finished a different project with nothing. American infrastructure at its finest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNCF#Modern_era https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNCF#Modern_era
- anon7000 1y agoThis is discussed in the article.
- onionisafruit 1y agoThat’s why we are discussing it here.
- deadfoxygrandpa 1y agoyeah and the author of the article totally misses the point
- doright 1y agoI had a chuckle at these two subsequent paragraphs. > One regular snipe is that it’s “easier to build rail in Morocco than in California.” > Al Boraq had full funding lined up before the project began. CAHSR did not. This led to delays that reduced support and encouraged critics, which starved it of funding commitments and thus led to further delays. California undermined CAHSR from the start. So, uh... it is easier to build rail in Morocco than in California. And California is part of the cause. It's not even a "snipe", it's just the truth.