6 ms·
Did FB chose to replace friends' posts with garbage, or was it that less and less people were posting, and FB had to replace the feed with _something_?
by orangepanda 1y ago
Did FB chose to replace friends' posts with garbage, or was it that less and less people were posting, and FB had to replace the feed with _something_?
- sorcerer-mar 1y agoLooking for cause and effect in a feedback loop is a fool's errand
- acdha 1y agoThose aren’t mutually exclusive options. Facebook wants to always have new things to show people so they stay on the site, but it was absolutely their choice to deprioritize your friends’ posts below advertisers and the “engaging” slop.
- corobo 1y agoVisiting friends' profiles, they still seem to be posting but I rarely see them on my feed. No I haven't got them muted or anything haha, and I can't speak for why the algorithm thinks I don't want to see the content. Maybe it's broken.
- gosub100 1y agoSome mid-level manager idiot's a/b test revealed that they could maximize engagement by showing more rage bait and less family. This increased revenue and nobody wants to suggest a change that lowers it.
- esafak 1y agoThey have relevance guardrails but they keep eroding.