5 ms·
The best thing you can do is compare it to another study, since turning 0.06 standard deviations into a percentage of happiness isn’t going to be that telling.
by kalkaran 1y ago
The best thing you can do is compare it to another study, since turning 0.06 standard deviations into a percentage of happiness isn’t going to be that telling.
In general, 0.2 is considered a small effect.
So 0.06 is quite small — likely not a practically noticeable change in well-being. But impressive to me when I compare it to effect sizes of therapy interventions which can lie around 0.3 for 12 weeks.
Quote:
> “50 randomized controlled trials that were published in 51 articles between 1998 and August 2018. We found standardized mean differences of Hedges’ g = 0.34 for subjective well-being, Hedges’ g = 0.39 for psychological well-being, indicating small to moderate effects, and Hedges’ g = 0.29 for depression, and Hedges’ g = 0.35 for anxiety and stress, indicating small effects.”
(Source: The efficacy of multi-component positive psychology interventions, 2019 — https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331028589_The_Efficacy_of_Multi-component_Positive_Psychology_Interventions https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331028589_The_Effic...)
- perching_aix 1y agoThis is a very useful insight, thank you. Wouldn't have occurred to me to check something like that.
- Balgair 1y agoCaveat: I'm not very smart So, if 0.3 is 12 weeks of therapy, then 0.06 is ~2.5 weeks of therapy (0.3/0.06 = 2.4), assuming you pick any 2.5 random weeks of the 12 week course. Yes, I'm sure the first session is the most important and then a logarithmic curve of blah blah blah. Essentially, deleting FB is not much, but it's not nothing either.